First-principles determination of the phonon-point defect scattering and thermal transport due to fission products in ThO2

Linu Malakkal, Ankita Katre, Shuxiang Zhou, Chao Jiang, David H. Hurley, Chris A. Marianetti, and Marat Khafizov
Phys. Rev. Materials 8, 025401 – Published 8 February 2024

Abstract

This work presents the first-principles calculations of the lattice thermal conductivity degradation due to point defects in thorium dioxide using an iterative solution of the Peierls-Boltzmann transport equation. We have used the nonperturbative Green's function methodology to compute the phonon-point defect scattering rates that consider the local distortion around the point defect, including the mass difference changes, interatomic force constants, and structural relaxation near the point defects. The point defects considered in this work include the vacancy of thorium (VTh) and oxygen (VO), substitutions of helium (HeTh), krypton (KrTh), zirconium (ZrTh), iodine (ITh), and xenon (XeTh) in the thorium site, and the three different configurations of the Schottky defects. The results of the phonon-defect scattering rate reveal that among all the considered intrinsic defects, the thorium vacancy and helium substitution in the thorium site scatter the phonon most due to the substantial changes in the force constant and structural distortions. The scattering of phonons due to the substitutional defects unveils that the zirconium atom scatters phonons the least, followed by xenon, iodine, krypton, and helium. This is contrary to the intuition that the scattering strength follows HeTh>KrTh>ZrTh>ITh>XeTh based on the mass difference. This striking difference in the zirconium phonon scattering is due to the local chemical environment changes. Zirconium is an electropositive element with valency similar to thorium and, therefore, can bond with the oxygen atoms, thus creating less force constant variance compared to iodine, an electronegative element, and the noble gases helium, xenon, and krypton. These results can serve as a benchmark for analytical models and help the engineering-scale modeling effort for nuclear design.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 30 August 2023
  • Accepted 18 January 2024

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.025401

©2024 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied PhysicsEnergy Science & Technology

Authors & Affiliations

Linu Malakkal1,*, Ankita Katre2,†, Shuxiang Zhou1, Chao Jiang1, David H. Hurley3, Chris A. Marianetti4, and Marat Khafizov5,‡

  • 1Computational Mechanics and Materials Department, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415, USA
  • 2Department of Scientific Computing, Modeling and Simulation, SP Pune University, Pune 411007, India
  • 3Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415, USA
  • 4Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, 500 West 120th Street, New York, New York 10027, USA
  • 5Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, 201 West 19th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA

  • *linu.malakkal@inl.gov
  • ankitamkatre@gmail.com
  • khafizov.1@osu.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 8, Iss. 2 — February 2024

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article part of CHORUS

Accepted manuscript will be available starting 7 February 2025.
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Materials

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×